Themes E-paper  RSS feeds  Join us on Facebook  Twitter Search


Analytics
Power sharing: a gentlemenґs agreement
Main trends of Russiaґs foreign Policy in transforming East and Southeast Asia
A New Nuclear International Order?
Explosions in New Delhi and Challenges to Indiaґs National Security
The fourth estate on the conflict in the Caucasus
"America and Russia have always been able to carry on positive cooperation" - John Beyrle
More>>
Other themes in Politics:
Government
President
Politics >> Analytics
Informational Warfare - a Geopolitical Reality

For Russia the informational war has become World War III. It was lost by Russia in August 2008, during the first five days of the hostilities in the Caucasus. Though the Russian population regarded the August war as justified, Russia and its army were exposed to critical attacks of the global media.
Bookmark and Share  
During the war, Saakashvili reiterated that the hostilities in the Caucasus resulted from the Russian aggression against the allegedly peaceful Georgia. Global media kept showing the devastations in the Georgian city of Gori and the pictures of the Russian artillery. The skillfully arranged footage and carefully adjusted texts instilled the corresponding notions in the brains of the US audience. In the meantime, the Georgian President kept telling the world that Russia's aggression targeted not only Georgia, but also the US, the EU, and NATO.

The Western media keep spreading the myth about the Russian aggression against the small defenseless Georgia. Russia continues to be portrayed as the hegemon and conqueror. Russia's offensive in Georgia is likened to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, and the policy of the current Russian administration is decried as "Stalinist" or "fascist".

Western media resorted to downright deception while covering the Five-Day War. Any attempts to make the views held by Russia and South Ossetia known to the public were blocked. A vivid example is the interview given by two Ossetian women to FOX News. They were not allowed to go on as soon as it became clear that they were about to thank Russia for saving them. The world saw the conflict through the eyes of Tbilisi.

***

The US has enough political influence to parlay its version of the events into the viewpoint dominating the opinion of international organizations and the general public. The CNN is often described as the informational miracle of the XX century having unparalleled influence over the audience. It aired the footage borrowed from Russia Today showing Tskhinvali in flames after the bombardment by the Georgian artillery, missiles, and warplanes while the commentator said it was the Georgian city of Gori devastated by the Russian army. It was explained later that a mistake had been made but the footage was on the air for hours while the mistake was mentioned only briefly and just once.

Informational operations against Russia are launched in full accord with the concept of the informational warfare. V. Putin revealed the essence of the approach when he said Western specialists are able to present the black as the white and the white as the black.

Georgia was also the first to launch an attack in cyberspace. When Tskhinvali was shelled on August 8 the majority of the South Ossetian sites were also knocked out. Later Russian media including Russia Today also came under cyberspace attacks. The response followed shortly as the sites of the Georgian President, parliament, government, and foreign ministry suffered malicious hacks. The site of Georgian President Saakashvili was simultaneously attacked from 500 IP-addresses. When the initially used addresses were blocked, the attacks resumed from others. The purpose was to render the Georgia sites completely inoperable. D.D.O.S. attacks overload and effectively shut own Internet servers. The addresses from which the requests meant to overload sites were sent were blocked by specialists from the Tulip Systems, but attacks from new 500 addresses began in just minutes. Cleaning up after a cyberspace attack took an average of 2 hours.

While the fighting raged, the Georgian side persistently overstated the Russian casualties. According to Georgian media, by the end of the Five-Day War, the number of warplanes lost by Russia totaled over 20, but the claims were not supported by any video or other documents. Speaking at a rally on August 14, Saakashvili said that Georgia was invaded by 1,200 Russian tanks. The number simply could not be real as the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe sets a ceiling for the number of tanks that makes it impossible. The informational aggression has nevertheless worked, at least in what concerns the Georgian audience. Whereas in the early 2007 only 25% of Georgians supported the military solution to the conflict with the breakaway Republics, by July 2008 polls showed that the number rose to 80%. The West played on the side of the Georgian media which day after day made the country's population believe that its army was "hardened in Iraq" and experienced, and President Saakashvili was a talented military commander. Georgian media deliberately distorted the intelligence data to portray Russia's army as incapable and the South Ossetian self-defense forces as semi-criminal and weak.

At present the theme of the war between Georgia and South Ossetia is used to address entirely different issues. For example, the treaty with Poland is signed by which the country is going to host the US missile shield infrastructures while criticism is leveled at Russia for deciding to arm its Baltic Navy with nuclear weapons. The US did not even have to invoke the Iranian missile threat to convince Poland to agree to the missile shield hosting deal as the war in the Caucasus created exactly the informational context the US needed on the occasion.

***

The analysis of the recent war in the Caucasus shows that special organizational, administrative, and analytical institutions must be established by a decree of the Russian President to counter foreign informational aggressions. Informational troops comprising state-run and army media should be created. The objective of the informational troops is to form the informational space shaping the international reality in accord with Russia's interests. The priorities of the informational troops should be strategic analysis, informational impact, and informational struggle. Their operations should be addressed to both the international and the domestic audiences. The personnel of the informational troops should comprise diplomats, experts, journalists, writers, columnists, interpreters, operators, communications specialists, web-designers, computer specialists, etc.

The informational warfare is a geopolitical reality. So far, the Russian political elite - as the Soviet political elite in the past - largely failed to appreciate the fact. This is the root of many of Russia's current problems.


Comments:

Ante:
Sir

Why do you always use term the "west"?

There are not two people who will agree on what and who is the west.As long as you call the USA the West you'll be a loser.
10-10-2009


ja:
the US is insecure with you RUSSIA...
09-30-2009


C.PARTRIDGE:
Ambricourt

Persons interested in the secret manipulation of Western "free" media may like to google Wikipedia: type in Mighty Wurlitzer and follow the link at the end of the article: "Journalism and the CIA".

This 1997 article needs updating; but one can be assured that whatever controls existed in the twentieth century have been strengthened over the past ten years. CIA-public relations power was shown in August 2008 in reporting the Georgian-Russia conflict: western news outlets and politicians still refer to the CIA version which places all responsibility for the conflict on Russia.

The U.S.-organized informational war has intensified, just as the American-NATO war against the rest of the world has become fanatical and genocidal.
06-17-2009


BradLAke:
I find myself agreeing with Ambricorts comments. But I think it's important to understand the nature of "Western" media. In many ways this media should be seen as the fourth corner on a balance of power with an Executive, Legislative, Judicial and Media branch. The Media has an agenda, and it is motivated by ratings given by the masses. The media only shows the masses information that drives up the ratings. The other three branches can try to influence this process, but if they tamper too much they themselves become the central topic in the news to their detriment. This is true for most of the Western Democracies. Russia is still struggling with this concept. They have given their press more freedom, but not to the point where it could become part of the balance of power we see in the west. I regularly see accusations in these types of articles that the western media is a tool of the current U.S. administration and unfairly represents Russia. Ask presidents Bill Clinton and G.W. Bush how fair the media represented them throughout their administrations. I think the West will trust Russian media when that media can safely put a magnifying glass on the actions of the Russian government. On a side note, I find it frustrating when an article like this refutes someone elseґs facts without providing their own. How many planes were shot down and how many tanks invaded? Providing believable facts helps a lot with credibility.
05-29-2009


Ambricourt:
There is a reality that may be called U.S.propaganda. But it is more tactful to call it U.S."rhetoric". Terms like "human rights", "the international community" (which excludes Russia),"aid workers", "humanitarian efforts" (often undertaken by specially trained U.S. military units) have become basic reference points in this propaganda/rhetoric: they are rarely questioned when disseminated by the media of "the free world". To the ears and eyes of hundreds of millions of people they convey an illusion of absolute truth.

The USSR failed to develop comparable convincing terms: Russia today is failing also.

An additional problem is control of the dissemination of news. That is entirely in the hands of the U.S. which offers no fair space for an alternative rhetoric in the MASS MARKET it ceaselessly manipulates.

Building an alternative convincing rhetoric is essential for world peace. Multilateralism, on every level, offers a larger potential for establishing a global balance of powers:informational multilateralism is as important as financial, military and political multilateralism.
05-11-2009


Adrian Garcia:
One lingering problem Russia faces in telling it's side of the story is that the vast majority of it's news is State-owned.

Our news stations, when they briefly mention Russia's view on the situation, never stop from saying 'Russian state television' said, etc. This is a deliberate method of discrediting what Russia's view is as 'propaganda'.

Whilst free-media, to me, is just as biased, it's clear Russia needs at least a few large networks that are free of State funding and running so that at least their words will look more credible in the eyes of the West.
11-14-2008


steveo:
Yes it is true that media did create a longer war time in Georgia getting in the way of Russian mission and exposing troops, The Americans free run from media in start of Iraq war until media involvement very dangerous times of Iraq become bombarded by interfering media exposing actions getting in the way of targeting the teariest the media had started to give significance As America wanted media out of the way cursed a lot of weaknesses before surge all moves exposed by media military couldn't react so then a lot of the media got killed then it would seam to help Americans to overcome On the Russian war front media interfered from very start in south Ossie media were interfering from start yet Russia overcome the interference very well.
11-11-2008




Current ratio: 3.07 (15 voted)
Rate this article:
Comment on this article:
Name:*

E-mail:

Where are you from:*

Text:*

"*" marked fields are mandatory


Tel.: +7 (495) 775-3114
Fax.: +7 (495) 988-9213
E-mail: info@rbth.ru